We evaluated the effects of FRS2 knockdown using shRNA in pancrea

We evaluated the effects of FRS2 knockdown using shRNA in pancreatic cancer cell lines to determine the dependency of cell viability on FGF signalling. Compared 17-AAG cost with the empty vector counterpart, FRS2�� expression was mostly abrogated by shRNA1 or shRNA2 in L3.6PL, Panc4.30 and AsPC1 cells (Figure 1A). FRS2��-targeting shRNAs induced marked decrease of phosphorylated AKT or ERK, with a decrease in Mcl-1 and cleaved Bid expression. These changes were accompanied by increased cell death compared with empty vector counterparts (Figure 1B; P<0.05), suggesting the dependence of L3.6PL, Panc4.30 and AsPC1 on FGFR signalling, and that the AKT and ERK pathways may have a functional role in FRS2�� shRNA-induced cell death.

Figure 1 Inhibition of FGFR signalling by FRS2�� knockdown exerted pro-apoptotic effects in pancreatic cancer cell lines, and was mediated via Akt/Mcl-1 axis. (A) Effect of FRS2��-targeting shRNAs on FGFR downstream signalling pathways in L3.6PL, … Dovitinib treatment exerted significant pro-apoptotic effect in pancreatic cancer cell lines with heightened FGFR signalling activation We next evaluated the feasibility of targeting FGFR signalling in pancreatic cancer using dovitinib, a potent pan-FGFR small molecule inhibitor. Dovitinib is also a potent inhibitor of PDGFR�� and VEGFR2, though Dey et al (2010) previously demonstrated that the major effects of dovitinib were primarily related to FGFR blockade. The dose�Cresponse effect of dovitinib was evaluated in a panel of six human pancreatic cancer cell lines (L3.6PL, Panc4.30, AsPC1, Panc2.13, SU86.

86 and Panc02.03). In Figure 2A, pancreatic cancer cells were treated with increasing concentrations of dovitinib (0�C10��M) for 3 days. Using 10��M as a cutoff, Panc2.13, SU86.86 and Panc02.03 were considered as resistant (IC50 not identified), and L3.6PL, Panc4.30 and AsPC1 sensitive to dovitinib treatment (IC50<10��M). The expression of FGFR1�C4 was determined in Figure 2B and were not significantly different between dovitinib-sensitive and �Cresistant cell lines (Supplementary Figure S1). We evaluated the status of apoptotic markers in Figure 2C and observed marked mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis with cleavage of caspase 3 and PARP in sensitive cell lines compared with resistant cell lines. Figure 2 Dovitinib's pro-apoptotic effect was related to FGFR signalling inhibition and more pronounced in pancreatic cancers with elevated p-FRS2/FRS2 ratio. (A) Dose�Cresponse of the in vitro anti-cancer effects of dovitinib in six Cilengitide pancreatic cancer cell … The expression of signalling proteins downstream to FGFRs of sensitive cell lines were then compared with resistant cells to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of dovitinib’s pro-apoptotic effect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>