[sulphite] plot) However, a relative standard deviation of up to

[sulphite] plot). However, a relative standard deviation of up to ±1.5% (n = 10) was evaluated for successive measurements in the 0.6–6.4 ppm of SO2, probably because the Fulvestrant clinical trial sample injection is being carried out manually and the reproducibility depends on the operator ability. Recovery experiments were also carried out using sodium sulphite samples prepared with deoxygenated electrolyte solution. In

all cases, 100% recovery was obtained demonstrating the reliability of our amperometric flow injection analysis system. One of the most eye-catching features is the speed (at least one measurement per minute), high reproducibility and sensitivity as shown in Fig. 2E, but real samples may contain many chemical species that are potential interfering agents. So, the robustness of our amperometric FIA method were evaluated in the presence of some of the potential constituents/additives, more specifically sodium benzoate, citric acid, glucose and pyrocatechol. The influence of those compounds on the results was tested measuring http://www.selleckchem.com/products/OSI-906.html the signal of (a) pure sulphite solutions and (b)

the interference of increasing concentrations of those compounds on the analyses of samples with the very same concentration of sulphite. No significant amperometric FIA signal could be measured for any of those compounds at low concentrations (0.08 mmol L−1), but relatively small signals were observed

for pyrocatechol and sodium benzoate, when their concentration was increased to 8 mmol L−1 (100 times higher than sulphite concentration), as shown in the region indicated as “g” in Fig. 3. Those results indicate that the PTFE membrane is very selective, blocking virtually all other species except the SO2 gas, strongly suggesting that our amperometric FIA method is almost insensitive to those interfering agents. However, they can interact with the analyte changing the analytical response. In order to verify this assumption, experiments were carried out mixing increasing amounts of those compounds to a sulphite sample and the results are shown in Fig. 3. Among all compounds, Dichloromethane dehalogenase the one that should be present in highest concentration in juices is glucose that increased the amperometric FIA signal only about 1–4%, in the range of 0.08–8 mmol L−1 (Fig. 3A). Pyrocatechol (Fig. 3C) induced a steady decrease of the signal as its concentration was increased reaching 5% at 0.8 mmol L−1 and 15% at 8 mmol L−1. Sodium benzoate (Fig. 3B) induced about 5–10% decrease in the signal, but no significant change in the effect could be observed as a function of the additive concentration.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>