Significantly higher scores were obtained for low level care residents compared selleck compound to high level care residents at discharge using the DEMMI and Modified Barthel

Index, which provided evidence of known-groups validity for both tools ( Table 3). Responsiveness to change: The DEMMI was significantly more responsive to change than the Modified Barthel Index when assessed using the criterion-based index, Guyatt’s responsiveness to change, and distribution-based index, effect size ( Table 4). The effect size for the DEMMI was in the small to moderate range, while the effect size for the Modified Barthel Index was in the small range. Minimum clinically important difference: Similar estimates of the minimum clinically important difference were obtained using criterion- and distribution-based methods for the Ulixertinib order DEMMI and Modified Barthel Index ( Table 5). Rasch analysis: At admission, no item had high positive fit residuals to indicate multidimensionality but the sit to stand item had a high negative fit residual, suggesting possible

redundancy. Six items (roll, sit to stand, stand, walking independence, picking up pen, and walking backwards) showed mild deviation from the Rasch model based on significant Bonferroni adjusted p values across class intervals and/or for individuals. There were no disordered thresholds or differential item functioning by age, gender, Charlson score, or whether an allied health assistant or physiotherapist administered the DEMMI. Item difficulty and person ability were well matched. However, overall fit to the Rasch model was not achieved, evidenced by a significant p value for χ2 testing for item trait interaction

(p < 0.01). However, 10 random samples of 100 fitted the model on each occasion and suggest that sample size influenced fit to the model in this population. The t-test procedure on admission data indicated Etomidate unidimensionality with a result of 2.17%. Rasch findings were similar for hospital discharge data. No items had high positive or negative fit residuals. Four items showed some mild deviation from the Rasch model (bridge, roll, stand, stand feet together). There was no differential item functioning for age, gender, or Charlson comorbidity score but there was significant systematic differential item functioning depending on whether an allied health assistant or physiotherapist administered the DEMMI for the bridge item. However, there were no patients in the first class interval among those assessed by an allied health assistant and this is likely to explain this finding. There were no disordered thresholds. Again, overall fit to the model was not achieved with a significant item trait interaction χ2 value of p < 0.01 but random samples of 100 fitted the model on 9 out of 10 occasions. The t-test procedure on discharge data indicated unidimensionality with a result of 3.04%.