525 321 323 318 17 100 0 G: Cytophaga 1208 EU104191 367 0 968 393

525 321 323 318 17 100.0 G: Cytophaga 1208 EU104191 367 0.968 393 397 392 33 100.0 G: Bdellovibrio 3173 CU466777 262 0.663 Groundwater samples from chloroethene-contaminated aquifers 63 69 64 93 85.3 F: Methylococcaceae 3686 AB354618 432 0.915       14 12.8 F: Crenotrichaceae 3681 GU454947 290 0.816       1 0.9 F: Ectothiorhodospiraceae 3510 AM902494 168 0.542       1 0.9 P: candidate phylum OP3 2388 GQ356152 187 0.488 165 168 163 143 100.0 G: Dehalococcoides 1368 EF059529 448 0.953 190 193 191 12 54.6 F: Desulfobulbaceae 3177 AJ389624 379 0.945       4 13.6 F: Sphingomonadaceae 2880 AY785128 263 0.555       2 9.1

F: Erythrobacteraceae 2872 DQ811848 343 0.771       2 9.1 C: Alphaproteobacteria 2451 AY921822 337 0.926       1 4.6 F: Rhodospirillaceae 2793 AY625147 294 0.679       1 4.6 F: AZD6738 chemical structure Rhodobiaceae 2641 AZD4547 manufacturer AB374390 328

0.877 198 201 196 140 98.6 G: Desulfovibrio 3215 FJ810587 473 1.000       4SC-202 supplier 2 1.4 F: Comamonadaceae 3039 FN428768 311 0.814 210 214 209 233 98.3 F: Dehalococcoidaceae 1367 EU679418 262 0.665       2 0.8 O: Burkhorderiales 3009 AM777991 367 0.927       1 0.4 F: Spirochaetaceae 4130 EU073764 295 0.848       1 0.4 P: candidate phylum TM7 4379 DQ404736 277 0.723 216 221 216 1010 90.9 F: Gallionellaceae 3080 EU802012 353 0.869       94 8.5 G: Rhodoferax 3050 DQ628925 369 0.920       3 0.3 G: Methylotenera 3093 AY212692 291 0.744       1 0.1 G: Methyloversatilis 3158 GQ340363 296 0.765       1 0.1 F: Clostridiaceae 2005 AJ863357 338 0.833       1 0.1 C: Anaerolineae 1315 AB179693 229 0.511       1 0.1 C: Actinobacteria 949 EU644115 372 0.907 243 247 243 389 99.7 F: Dehalococcoidaceae Baf-A1 price 1367 EU679418 255 0.631       1 0.3 F: Anaerolinaceae 1321 AB447642 253 0.806 a Experimental (eT-RF) and digital T-RFs (dT-RF). b Digital T-RF obtained after having shifted the digital dataset with the most probable average cross-correlation

lag. c Number of reads of the target phylotype that contribute to the T-RF. d Diverse bacterial affiliates can contribute to the same T-RF. e Phylogenetic affiliation of the T-RF (K: kingdom, P: phylum, C: class, O: order, F: family, G: genus, S: species). Only the last identified phylogenetic branch is presented here. f Reference operational taxonomic unit (OTU) from the Greengenes public database related with the best SW mapping score. In the Greengenes taxonomy, OTU refer to terminal levels at which sequences are classified. g GenBank accession numbers provided by Greengenes for reference sequences. h Best SW mapping score obtained. SW scores consider nucleotide positions and gaps. The highest SW mapping score that can be obtained for a read is the length of the read itself. i SW mapping score normalized by the read length, as an estimation of the percentage of identity. j After having observed the presence of the dT-RF 34 bp, we returned to the raw eT-RFLP data and found an important eT-RF at 32 bp. However, Rossi et al.

Comments are closed.