010, respectively In addition, at the endpoint of rejection (40

010, respectively. In addition, at the endpoint of rejection (40 hours post-transplantation), the xenogeneic group/syngeneic control group ratio of miR-146a, miR-155, PD0332991 purchase and miR-451 measured by QRT-PCR assay was 2.869 ± 0.464, 1.808 ± 0.432, and 0.079 ± 0.006, respectively (P < 0.05 vs. syngeneic controls, n = 8 per group), whereas the ratios of those miRNAs detected by the microarray assay were

3.284, 1.667, and 0.021, respectively. This was accordant with the data from the QRT-PCR assay (Fig. 2). Recently, significant progress has been made in studying the role of miRNA in regulating the nervous and hematopoietic system, as well as in the immune response in diseases like cancer.[4] However, the profiles of miRNA expression in organ transplantation, especially in xenotransplantation, have yet to be

fully understood. In this study, a well-established heterotopic cardiac xenotransplantation model was used to determine the profiles of miRNA expression in xenograft rejection. As the mean survival time of heart xenografts is 40.17 ± 3.76 hours, 40 hours was chosen as the study endpoint for this xenotransplant model. The intragraft miRNA expressions between the xenogeneic group and the syngeneic group were then compared at uniform time points. At both the 24-hour time point as well as the endpoint of rejection after xenografting, a total of 31 miRNAs LY2835219 cell line were found to be differentially expressed in xenografts when compared with syngeneic heart grafts; of these, 17 miRNAs were upregulated and 14 miRNAs were

downregulated, indicating that these miRNAs may play important roles in the regulation of xenograft rejection. Furthermore, because of significant differential expression, miR-146a, miR-155, and miR-451 were selected Glutathione peroxidase as representative miRNAs to be used in the relative quantitative test that verified miRNA microarray results. It was determined that xenografts showed significantly increased levels of miR-146a and miR-155 and significantly decreased levels of miR-451. In addition, the changes of xenogeneic group/syngeneic control group ratios detected by QRT-PCR were consistent with those of the miRNA microarray data. By using TargetScan, 21 of 31 differentially expressed miRNAs were found for their predicted target genes in heart xenografts. Using this information, a functional annotation for the miRNAs was made by David analysis to determine the impact factor in the xenograft rejection (data not shown); this analysis may provide very important information for future in further studies. The differential expression of miRNAs in allografts has been studied in a mouse heart transplantation model.[11] However, reports regarding the profiles of miRNA in xenograft rejection are presently lacking. By comparing the data obtained from the allogeneic study by Wei et al.[11] with our xenogeneic study, it was demonstrated that miR-146a, miR-155, and miR-150 were upregulated in both allografts and xenografts—this shows the same trend in miRNA expression.

Comments are closed.