Real-time quantitative PCR RT-qPCR using TaqMan® Gene Expression Assays (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) was performed for the following 13 targets in order to confirm microarray gene expression results: CXCL9 (Mm00434946_m1), HIF1A (Mm00468878_m1), IFNG (Mm01168134_m1), IL17A (Mm00439619_m1), IL6 (Mm01210733_m1), IRGM1 (Mm00492596_m1), ISG20 (Mm00469585_m1), LYVE1 (Mm00475056_m1),

PSMB9 (Mm00479004_m1), STAT1 (Mm00439531_m1), THBS1 (Mm01335418_m1), TNFA (Mm99999068_m1) and UBD (Mm00499179_m1). Total RNA was isolated from frozen lung tissues of individual DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice at each time point using the ULTRASPECTM Total RNA Isolation Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Biotecx Labs). cDNA was reversed transcribed from extracted Savolitinib in vitro RNA using the qScript cDNA SuperMix from Quanta Biosciences (Gaithersburg, MD). RNA quality was assessed using the Experion bioanalyzer from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). Three C57BL/6 samples (one at day 14 and two at day 16) were determined to be of low quality. Therefore, gene expression of the 13 targets was assessed by RT-qPCR in a total of 15 samples: three samples from both strains at day 10, two C57BL/6 and three DBA/2 samples

at day 14, and one C57BL/6 and three check details DBA/2 samples at day 16. RT-qPCR was performed with the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies) using 50 ng of cDNA in a 20 μL reaction selleck kinase inhibitor volume for each target in duplicate. The reaction conditions were as follows: 50°C for 2 minutes, 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 45 cycles at 95°C for 15 seconds, and 60°C for 1 minute. RT-qPCR data analysis was performed using DataAssist software (Life Technologies) mafosfamide and the significance of differential gene expression between mouse strains assessed with a t-test. Changes in gene expression levels were assessed through relative quantification (RQ) using the endogenous control, glucuronidase beta (GUSB, Mm01197698_m1), because it is one of the most stable housekeeping genes found expressed the mouse lung [73]. Briefly, the threshold

cycle of amplification (Ct) for each sample was compared with that of the endogenous control GUSB. The difference in Ct between the sample and GUSB was expressed as ΔCt. For each gene assayed, the difference in ΔCt between each sample and the sample selected as the control (a randomly selected C57BL/6 mouse sample analyzed at each day) was expressed as ΔΔCt. The RQ of each sample was then calculated as 2-∆∆CT. RQ values were log2 transformed and averaged across biological replicates separately for each time point (day 10, 14 or 16) in order to calculate fold change differences between DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice for comparison to microarray data. This transformation was also performed prior to statistical analyses with DataAssist in order to satisfy the normality assumption, as previously described [74, 75].