In order http://www.selleckchem.com/products/VX-770.html to compare the previous study with the present results, response properties at the population level, specifically, in hV4 and LOC, were investigated. In the control group, hV4 showed significant adaptation effects induced

by 2D and 3D objects as well as by line drawings (p < 0.01), but not 2D objects in different sizes or 3D objects in different viewpoints (p > 0.05). The AIs of both hemispheres were significantly correlated (R = 0.81; p < 0.05; Figure 7A; Table S3). LOC showed adaptation effects evoked by all types of object stimuli including 2D objects in different sizes and 3D objects in different viewpoints (p < 0.01). Again, the hemispheres' responses were significantly correlated (R = 0.64; p < 0.05; Figures 7B and S8; Table S3). In hV4 of SM, however, no significant adaptation effects were found in the LH (p > 0.05). In contrast, in the RH, 2D and 3D objects as well as 2D objects in different sizes evoked adaptation effects (p < 0.01), whereas line drawings and 3D objects in different viewpoints induced no adaptation.

The AIs were not correlated between both hemispheres (R = 0.33; p > 0.05; Figure 7A; click here Table S3). The adaptation profile of LOC was similar to hV4, with no adaptation effects found in the LH (p > 0.05). In contrast, in the RH, 2D and 3D objects as well as 2D objects in different sizes evoked adaptation effects (p < 0.01), while line drawings and 3D objects in different viewpoints induced no adaptation. The AIs were not correlated between hemispheres (R = STK38 0.5; p > 0.05; Figure 7B; Table S3). The correlation coefficients between SM and the group were different (p < 0.05). These results indicated hemispheric asymmetries of intermediate hV4 and higher-order LOC in the ventral pathway of SM. Furthermore, both areas showed similar response profiles. The LH showed no significant adaptation effects, whereas the RH showed adaptation induced by 2D and 3D objects as well as 2D objects in different sizes. Within the RH, adaptation effects induced by 2D and 3D objects were similar between SM and the controls. Interestingly, hV4

showed size-invariant response properties in SM, while responses of hV4 in healthy subjects were size specific. Furthermore, LOC was dependent on the viewpoint of objects in SM, whereas LOC in the controls exhibited viewpoint-invariant response properties. Finally, semantically meaningful line drawings induced no object-selective responses in the ventral pathway of SM. To gain insight as to how SM perceived the stimuli that were presented in the fMRI experiments, we tested SM on a same/different judgment task and a naming task using the object stimuli from the fMR-A experiments after the scanning experiments were completed. In the same/different judgment task, two objects were shown for unlimited duration and SM pressed one of two buttons to indicate his response.