This observation was supported by a significant interaction betwe

This observation was supported by a significant interaction between Session and Strain (p < 0.01), and no main effect of Strain was detected (p = 0.346). Spatial retention was also tested 1 week after the last session in a single probe trial (session

10). All the Talazoparib concentration mice retained the previously learned information well. In comparing genotypes within the SedCon groups, there was no effect of Strain (p = 0.97) on the performance of the mice. There was no difference between the performance of the E3 and E4 mice and no effect of Treatment (all p > 0.221). The mice were also tested on a visible platform test to determine whether their vision may have affected their performance in the MWM. A composite measure, learning index, was calculated by averaging the path length taken by the mice to the flagged platform during sessions 2, 3, and 4 (Fig. 3). There was no

discernable effect of Strain or Treatment on the performance of the mice, which was supported by a lack of main effect or interaction between Strain and Treatment (all p > 0.164). Swimming speed on sessions 2, 3, and 4 was also averaged and considered for analysis. The speed of the SedCon E4 mice was 25% faster than the SedCon E3 ones, and there was no effect of the Treatment on the speed of the E3 or E4 mice. These observations were supported by a significant main effect of Strain (p < 0.05) and a lack KU-55933 concentration of main effect of Treatment or an interaction (all p > 0.386). There were no differences in performance between the wild-type, E3, and E4 mice when analyzing the learning index (p = 0.989).

The speed of the wild-type was comparable to the one of the E4 mice, which was significantly higher than the swimming speed of the E3 mice. This was supported by a significant effect of Strain (p < 0.05) following a one-way ANOVA. Components of the discriminated avoidance learning were considered for effects of Strain and Treatment during the acquisition and reversal sessions. Learning of the preemptive response is shown in Fig. 4, whereas the discriminative component is shown in Fig. 5. During acquisition, the SedCon E4 mice took 13% more trials than their E3 counterparts. The ExCon and Adenylyl cyclase ExEC E3 mice took 27% and 22.5% less trials to reach the avoidance criterion compared to the SedCon E3 mice. Number of trials taken to make a correct avoidance response was reduced by 18%–20% in the SedEC, ExCon, and ExEC E4 mice in comparison to their genotype-matched control (SedCon). Analysis of the trials to avoidance criterion for session 1 yielded a significant main effects of Strain and Treatment (all p < 0.021) but no interaction of Strain and Treatment (p = 0.63). In the reversal session, there was no difference between the SedCon E3 and SedCon E4.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>