Riegl (1995) found surge-induced peak suspended-sediment concentr

Riegl (1995) found surge-induced peak suspended-sediment concentrations of up to 389 mg L−1 in sandy gullies and 112 mg L−1 over coral on South African reefs; this, however, was local sediment stirred up and immediately re-deposited. While the studies above demonstrate that coral reefs and turbidity/sedimentation can coexist, it also shows the danger of introducing sediment since it is likely to be remobilised repeatedly.

All the reef systems discussed in the previous two paragraphs were clearly adapted to sedimentation and turbidity, with mostly low accretion rates demonstrated in South Africa (Ramsay and Mason, 1990 and Riegl et al., 1995) and quite high accretion rates on inshore reefs from the Great Barrier Reef (Larcombe GSK1120212 mw et al., 1995), comparable to those in “optimal” environments. Corals that are naturally exposed to high and variable background conditions of turbidity and sedimentation (e.g. due to storms and/or river influence) will show higher tolerances to short increases in turbidity or sedimentation MS-275 price caused by dredging (Nieuwaal, 2001). Corals from shallow-water environments, where they are frequently exposed to elevated temperatures,

storms and wave action, are more likely to be tolerant of environmental stresses than corals in deeper waters (Brown and Howard, 1985, Hoeksema, 1991b and Hoeksema and Matthews, 2011). A synthesis of literature data regarding the sensitivity of different coral species to turbidity is presented in Table 5. These data were reworked and related to a relative sensitivity index according

to the response matrix presented in Table 6. Sensitivity classes were then given scores from 1 to 5, with 1 corresponding to “very tolerant” and 5 to “very sensitive”. The scores for individual coral species were subsequently related to their dominant growth form and mean Phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase calyx diameter. Analysis of these data (90 entries for 46 species) confirmed that there is a significant relationship (Kruskal–Wallis, P < 0.05) between the growth form of corals and their sensitivity to turbidity ( Fig. 5a). Most soft corals and many massive coral species are relatively sensitive to turbidity while laminar, plating and tabular corals as well as some morphologically variable corals are relatively tolerant. There was no significant relationship between the calyx diameter of corals and their sensitivity to turbidity ( Fig. 5b). Most coral species are sensitive to enhanced sedimentation, even in the order of a few centimetres per year (Rogers, 1990). Pastorok and Bilyard (1985) suggested that sedimentation rates of >50 mg cm−2 d−1 (equivalent to 500 g m−2 d−1) may be considered catastrophic for some coral communities, while 10–50 mg cm−2 d−1 could be classified as moderate to severe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>